Key result
Oral anticoagulation maintains consistent lupus anticoagulant status in ~90% of patients.
Cohort (n=40)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Laboratory-specific cut-off lupus ratios (LR), above which a plasma is judged positive for lupus anticoagulant (LA), were established for both activated partial thromboplastin time-based and dilute Russell viper venom time-based methods. The validity of using these cut-off values to determine the presence of LA in patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) was assessed. A cohort of 40 patients (23 male and 17 female), aged 22-84 years (mean 52 years) were tested for LA at the time of a thrombotic event. Repeated testing was performed after the same patients were treated with OAC (international normalized ratio 2.0-3.5). For 36 patients (90%), LA status was unchanged pre- and on-OAC. Thirteen of the 40 patients (32.5%) were positive for LA both pre- and on-OAC. Of the 27 patients negative for LA pre-OAC, 23 remained negative on-OAC. The four discordant results were interesting in that LA positivity was demonstrated only after the patient was stable on-OAC. In our cohort of 40 patients, there was a trend for LRs to decrease on-OAC, but this did not reach statistical significance. The subset (4) went against this trend and became positive after the thrombotic event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ABOUD et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Thrombotic event requiring oral anticoagulation (n=40). Oral anticoagulation (INR 2.0-3.5) with lupus ratio testing vs. Pre-oral anticoagulation baseline at the time of a thrombotic event was evaluated on Lupus anticoagulant positivity. Oral anticoagulation (INR 2.0-3.5) maintained consistent lupus anticoagulant status in 90% of patients (36/40), with 32.5% remaining positive and 57.5% remaining negative.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: