This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: Cochlear implants (CIs) are an effective rehabilitation option for individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). While genetic factors play a significant role in SNHL, the variability in CI outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluated short- and long-term CI outcomes in a large genotyped cohort and investigated correlations with genetic defects and their cochlear site-of-lesion. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included 220 subjects (127 females; 299 ears) with pathogenic variants identified in 31 different nuclear genes and in mitochondrial genes. Audiological outcomes were measured pre- and post-implantation. Cochlear site-of-lesion was categorized as pre-synaptic, post-synaptic, or mitochondrial, based on gene function or expression. Multiple regression analysis assessed factors influencing outcomes, including age at implantation, SNHL duration, hearing aid (HA) use, and cochlear site-of-lesion. RESULTS: Results showed a median phoneme score of 90%, with better outcomes in early implantation (≤ 6 years). Variability in outcomes was not linked to cochlear site-of-lesion, but to subject-specific factors, such as age at implantation, duration of SNHL, pre-implantation HA use, and CI experience. A model incorporating these subject-specific factors explained 19% of the total variance in outcomes. Poorer outcomes (phoneme scores < 70%) were more common in individuals with prolonged auditory deprivation or older age at implantation. CONCLUSION: Genotyped CI recipients demonstrated excellent outcomes, with variability largely attributed to non-genetic factors. These findings show that cochlear implantation is a beneficial type of rehabilitation for most individuals with hereditary SNHL and underscore the importance of early implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fehrmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: