Key result
Persistent emotional distress after a first-time MI was associated with increased cardiovascular (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.16-1.84) and non-cardiovascular mortality compared to no distress.
Why the study?
While emotional distress post-MI is linked to worse prognosis, whether specific subgroups of patients with emotional distress are more vulnerable is less well established.
Does persistent emotional distress increase late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients with a first-time MI?
Cohort (n=57,602)
Yes
Does persistent emotional distress increase late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients with a first-time MI?
Hazard Ratio: 1.46 (95% CI 1.16–1.84)
Persistent emotional distress after a first-time MI is associated with significantly increased risks of both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, highlighting a vulnerable subgroup that may benefit from targeted intervention.
Persistent distress after first MI was associated with higher mortality; hypothesis-generating for targeted interventions.
BACKGROUND: Patients with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety - emotional distress - after a myocardial infarction (MI) have been shown to have worse prognosis and increased healthcare costs. However, whether specific subgroups of patients with emotional distress are more vulnerable is less well established. The purpose of this study was to identify the association between different patterns of emotional distress over time with late cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality among first-MI patients aged <75 years in Sweden. METHODS: We utilized data on 57,602 consecutive patients with a first-time MI from the national SWEDEHEART registers. Emotional distress was assessed using the anxiety/depression dimension of the European Quality of Life Five Dimensions questionnaire two and 12 months after the MI, combined into persistent (emotional distress at both time-points), remittent (emotional distress at the first follow-up only), new (emotional distress at the second-follow up only) or no distress. Data on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality were obtained until the study end-time. We used multiple imputation to create complete datasets and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios. RESULTS: Patients with persistent emotional distress were more likely to die from cardiovascular (hazard ratio: 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.16, 1.84) and non-cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.30, 1.82) than those with no distress. Those with remittent emotional distress were not statistically significantly more likely to die from any cause than those without emotional distress. DISCUSSION: Among patients who survive 12 months, persistent, but not remittent, emotional distress was associated with increased cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. This indicates a need to identify subgroups of individuals with emotional distress who may benefit from further assessment and specific treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lissåker et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in First-time myocardial infarction (n=57,602). Persistent emotional distress vs. No emotional distress was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.16, 1.84). Persistent emotional distress after a first-time MI was associated with increased cardiovascular (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.16-1.84) and non-cardiovascular mortality compared to no distress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: