Key result
Single breath-hold 3D LGE MRI provided equal diagnostic image quality to standard 2D LGE MRI in patients with acute and chronic myocarditis, while significantly reducing acquisition time (24 vs 350 seconds, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a fast 3D LGE MRI sequence provide comparable image quality and fibrosis quantification to standard 2D LGE in patients with acute and chronic myocarditis?
Observational (n=52)
Double-blind
No
Does a fast 3D LGE MRI sequence provide comparable image quality and fibrosis quantification to standard 2D LGE in patients with acute and chronic myocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 24% vs 350%
p-value: p=<0.001
A fast 3D LGE MRI sequence provides equal diagnostic quality and fibrosis quantification compared to standard 2D LGE in myocarditis patients, but with significantly reduced acquisition time.
3D LGE offers comparable fibrosis assessment in myocarditis; leaves open whether it can replace 2D LGE in routine clinical use.
We compared a fast, single breath-hold three dimensional LGE sequence (3D LGE) with an established two dimensional multi breath-hold sequence (2D LGE) and evaluated image quality and the amount of myocardial fibrosis in patients with acute and chronic myocarditis. 3D LGE and 2D LGE (both spatial resolution 1.5 × 1.5 mm 2 , slice-thickness 8 mm, field of view 350 × 350 mm 2 ) were acquired in 25 patients with acute myocarditis (mean age 40 ± 18 years, 7 female) and 27 patients with chronic myocarditis (mean age 44 ± 22 years, 9 female) on a 1.5 T MR system. Image quality was evaluated by two independent, blinded readers using a 5-point Likert scale. Total myocardial mass, fibrotic mass and total fibrotic tissue percentage were quantified for both sequences in both groups. There was no significant difference in image quality between 3D und 2D acquisitions in patients with acute (p = 0.8) and chronic (p = 0.5) myocarditis. No significant differences between 3D and 2D acquisitions could be shown for myocardial mass (acute p = 0.2; chronic p = 0.3), fibrous tissue mass (acute p = 0.7; chronic p = 0.1) and total fibrous percentage (acute p = 0.4 and chronic p = 0.2). Inter-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Acquisition time was significantly shorter for 3D LGE (24 ± 5 s) as compared to 2D LGE (350 ± 58 s, p < 0.001). In patients with acute and chronic myocarditis 3D LGE imaging shows equal diagnostic quality compared to standard 2D LGE imaging but with significantly reduced acquisition time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polacin et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Acute and chronic myocarditis (n=52). 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI vs. 2D LGE MRI was evaluated on Acquisition time (seconds) (p=<0.001). Single breath-hold 3D LGE MRI provided equal diagnostic image quality to standard 2D LGE MRI in patients with acute and chronic myocarditis, while significantly reducing acquisition time (24 vs 350 seconds, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: