Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The so-called reduced multireference (RMR) coupled cluster method restricted to singly and doubly excited clusters (CCSD) [see X. Li and J. Paldus, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6257 (1997)] is employed to compute potential energy surfaces for the HF, F2 and H2O molecules over a wide range of geometries using basis sets of a double zeta (DZ) and DZ plus polarization (DZP) quality. The RMR-CCSD method belongs to a class of externally corrected CCSD approaches, which rely on a suitable non-CC wave function that is flexible enough to describe the dissociation process at hand and is used as a source of 3- and 4-body cluster amplitudes. These amplitudes are in turn used to achieve a more appropriate decoupling of the full CC chain of equations than that leading to the standard CCSD equations. The RMR-CCSD method employs for this purpose a MR-CISD wave function obtained with a relatively small active or model space. To illustrate the capabilities of this approach, the computed potential energy curves for the HF, F2 and H2O molecules are compared with the exact full CI or highly accurate large scale CI results, as well as with the MR-CISD results that are used as a source of 3- and 4-body amplitudes in the RMR-CCSD method. In all cases, the RMR-CCSD energies are far better than the standard CCSD energies or MR-CISD energies obtained with the same active space. The paper clearly demonstrates that the RMR-CCSD method provides very accurate data, while requiring only a modest increase in the computational effort over that of the standard CCSD method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: