This paper has derived a preflood road maintenance strategy. It provides an innovative approach by upgrading pavement strength now (Year 1 of the analysis) with a thin overlay, and then evaluating pavement lifecycle performance if a flood comes in different years. An after-flood treatment strategy would also be a part of this strategy package. The study has considered normal deterioration after a treatment given in Year 1 and uses the new roughness and rutting based road deterioration (RD) models to predict after-flood deterioration before providing postflood treatments. The study has used highway development and management (HDM-4) model for obtaining after-flood treatments. The results show pavement performance, necessary treatments at Year 1 and any year, required budget, and economic results. For a case study in Queensland, Australia, the treatment cost in Year 1 was about $21.13 billion, and the total preflood strategy cost is $37 billion to $38 billion. A thin overlay is adequate for after-flood rehabilitation. This preflood strategy is compared with a recently derived postflood strategy, and it appears that a preflood strategy can maintain the network better and demonstrate positive economic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: