Key result
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass resulted in a significantly greater percentage of total weight loss compared to sleeve gastrectomy (MD -2.33%, p=0.001) at 12 months in patients with severe obesity.
Why the study?
To evaluate the effects of OAGB, RYGB, and SG on cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with severe obesity.
Do different bariatric surgery procedures (OAGB, RYGB, SG) differentially improve cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with severe obesity?
Cohort (n=485)
None
Non-randomized
No
Do different bariatric surgery procedures (OAGB, RYGB, SG) differentially improve cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with severe obesity?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bariatric surgery significantly improves cardiometabolic risk factors in severe obesity at 12 months, with RYGB and OAGB providing greater weight and fat mass loss than SG.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) in patients with severe obesity. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with severe obesity who had undergone OAGB, RYGB, or SG between 2015 and 2017 and follow-up assessments over 12-months. RESULTS: Among 485 included patients, anthropometric measurements, body composition, fasting blood glucose (FBG), lipid profile, and comorbidities were significantly improved for all three procedures throughout the follow-up period. Weight, % total weight loss (%TWL), body mass index, fat mass and fat mass to fat-free mass ratio improvements were higher with RYGB and OAGB than SG. There were no significant differences between procedures in all other variables. A significant trend toward remission rate of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus was observed with all three procedures, with no significant difference between the three groups. %TWL statistically correlated with fat mass, FBG, and triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: OAGB, RYGB, and SG had a beneficial impact on CMRFs and comorbidities during 12 months of follow-up. Of note, RYGB and OAGB may result in better outcomes, particularly anthropometric and body composition indices. Further large-sample, long-term follow-up studies are required to expand on the present findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabesh et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe obesity (n=485). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) vs. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was evaluated on Percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months (SG vs RYGB) (MD -2.33%, p=0.001). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass resulted in a significantly greater percentage of total weight loss compared to sleeve gastrectomy (MD -2.33%, p=0.001) at 12 months in patients with severe obesity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: