Key result
Agreement between medical records and patient self-reports for health conditions varied significantly in ACS patients, with odds of agreement being 42% higher for those with at least some college education.
Why the study?
Does patient-reported medical history via questionnaire agree with medical record documentation in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cross-Sectional (n=62)
No
Does patient-reported medical history via questionnaire agree with medical record documentation in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 1.42 (95% CI 1–2.01)
p-value: p=0.053
There are significant discrepancies between patient-reported medical history and medical records in ACS patients, which may impact care quality and safety.
Verification of self-reports may improve ACS care safety; hypothesis-generating for education-adjusted validation in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Many critical treatment decisions are based on the medical history of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Discrepancies between the medical history documented by a health professional and the patient's own report may therefore have important health consequences. METHODS: Medical histories of 117 patients with an ACS were documented. A questionnaire assessing the patient's health history was then completed by 62 eligible patients. Information about 13 health conditions with relevance to ACS management was obtained from the questionnaire and the medical record. Concordance between these two sources and reasons for discordance were identified. RESULTS: There was significant variation in agreement, from very poor in angina (kappa < 0) to almost perfect in diabetes (kappa = 0.94). Agreement was substantial in cerebrovascular accident (kappa = 0.76) and hypertension (kappa = 0.73); moderate in cocaine use (kappa = 0.54), smoking (kappa = 0.46), kidney disease (kappa = 0.52) and congestive heart failure (kappa = 0.54); and fair in arrhythmia (kappa = 0.37), myocardial infarction (kappa = 0.31), other cardiovascular diseases (kappa = 0.37) and bronchitis/pneumonia (kappa = 0.31). The odds of agreement was 42% higher among individuals with at least some college education (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.00 - 2.01, p = 0.053). Listing of a condition in medical record but not in the questionnaire was a common cause of discordance. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies in aspects of the medical history may have important effects on the care of ACS patients. Future research focused on identifying the most effective and efficient means to obtain accurate health information may improve ACS patient care quality and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eze‐Nliam et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute coronary syndrome (n=62). Patient self-report vs. Medical record documentation was evaluated on Odds of agreement across 13 health conditions for individuals with at least some college education versus those without (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00-2.01, p=0.053). Agreement between medical records and patient self-reports for health conditions varied significantly in ACS patients, with odds of agreement being 42% higher for those with at least some college education.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: