Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective. The objective of this article is to explain judicial decision making at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia by analyzing the impact of individual, national, and international factors. Methods. We use regression and probit analysis of data on the verdicts and sentences handed down by the judges. Results. We find that international factors best explain judicial decision making, especially regarding sentencing. Conclusions. International tribunals and courts are becoming increasingly important and prevalent and it is critical that scholars better understand how their judges make decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meernik et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: