This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Low-permeability coalbed methane recovery is restricted by dense pore-fracture structures and the limited cavitation efficiency of conventional water media. This study introduces MIL-100(Fe) nanofluid as an active ultrasonic cavitation medium to regulate cavitation nucleation and strengthen coal pore-network reconstruction. Two coal samples were treated by water- and nanofluid-mediated ultrasonic cavitation and characterized using in-situ X-ray nano-CT, SEM, FTIR, XRD, BET/FHH analysis, nanoindentation, and high-pressure methane adsorption. Compared with water treatment, nanofluid-mediated ultrasonic cavitation more effectively weakened aromatic C–H adsorption sites, increased hydroxyl-related absorption, and optimized microcrystalline parameters, with d 002 / f a reaching 0.0819 nm/0.146 for BG coal and 0.0805 nm/0.142 for SJZ coal. It increased porosity to 29.10% and 30.10%, raised connected-pore volume fractions to 95.23% and 95.64%, and formed mesopore–macropore structures containing 47.5–59.8% mesopores and 40.2–52.5% macropores. The Langmuir adsorption capacity decreased from 16.77 to 10.48 mg g −1 for BG coal and from 24.52 to 17.70 mg g −1 for SJZ coal, while Young’s modulus decreased from 7.96 to 7.01 GPa and from 6.95 to 6.53 GPa, respectively. These results reveal that MIL-100(Fe) nanofluid enhances ultrasonic cavitation through coupled porous multicenter nucleation, thermal regulation, and particle scouring, thereby converting isolated pores into connected methane desorption pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: