Why the study?
The role of baroreflex sensitivity in head-up tilt testing for predicting the therapeutic response of vasovagal syncope patients to metoprolol had not been explored.
Does baseline baroreflex sensitivity predict therapeutic response to metoprolol in pediatric patients with vasovagal syncope?
Does baseline baroreflex sensitivity predict therapeutic response to metoprolol in pediatric patients with vasovagal syncope?
Baseline supine baroreflex sensitivity >10 ms/mmHg can effectively predict a positive clinical response to metoprolol in children with vasovagal syncope.
Supine BRS may identify metoprolol responders among children with VVS; leaves open prospective validation before any clinical use.
Objective: To explore the role of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in head-up tilt test in predicting the therapeutic response of vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients to metoprolol. Materials and Methods: VVS patients treated by metoprolol were enrolled in this study and they were classified as responders and non-responders according to the changes in symptom scores before and after metoprolol treatment. Values of BRS at supine and at positive response occurrence in head-up tilt test were obtained and BRS changes from supine to positive response occurrence were calculated. Differences between responders and non-responders were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the values of BRS in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric patients with VVS. Results: Forty patients (14 boys; 11.8 ± 2.5 years) diagnosed with VVS were recruited in the study, 28 of whom were verified as responders to metoprolol and the other 12 patients as non-responders. They did not show any differences in baseline characteristics and hemodynamics in head-up tilt test (p > 0.05). However, the responders had an obviously increased supine BRS value compared to the non-responders (16.9 7.7 ms/mmHg vs 7.6 3.8 ms/mmHg; p 0.05). Accordingly, the changes in BRS of responders were more obvious than that of non-responders (8.0 7.8 ms/mmHg vs -3.0 10.4 ms/mmHg; p < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of supine BRS was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.7790.995; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 10 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 83% respectively in predicting therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric VVS patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of BRS changes was 0.827 (95% CI, 0.6930.962; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 4 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 83%, respectively. Conclusion: BRS may predict the response of children with VVS to metoprolol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: