Why the study?
Pestiviruses cause infectious diseases resulting in tremendous economic losses to animal husbandry, and different vaccines have been developed to control and prevent them.
This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of various pestivirus vaccines and their potential as viral vectors for multivalent vaccines.
Emerging pestivirus species and vaccines expand known diversity; leaves open questions on cross-protection and control strategies.
mainly comprises classical swine fever virus (CSFV), bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 (BVDV-1), BVDV-2, border disease virus (BDV), and multiple new pestivirus species such as atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV), giraffe pestivirus, and antelope pestivirus. Pestiviruses cause infectious diseases, resulting in tremendous economic losses to animal husbandry. Different types of pestivirus vaccines have been developed to control and prevent these important animal diseases. In recent years, pestiviruses have shown great potential as viral vectors for developing multivalent vaccines. This review analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various pestivirus vaccines, including live attenuated pestivirus strains, genetically engineered marker pestiviruses, and pestivirus-based multivalent vaccines. This review provides new insights into the development of novel vaccines against emerging pestiviruses, such as APPV and ovine pestivirus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: