Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photocarrier interfacial kinetics is often considered to be a bottleneck for water photooxidation on semiconductors and has attracted extensive attention in recent years. Although tremendous efforts have been devoted into the kinetic study for a certain semiconductor, there are few works focused on the dynamic differences in water oxidation between various kinds of semiconductors. In this study, the kinetics of water oxidation on WO 3 and TiO 2 electrodes was investigated by a combination of photoelectrochemical techniques and then compared using the electrodes’ rate law. It was found that the water oxidation on WO 3 is faster than the that of TiO 2 electrodes under the same surface hole density and the basic origin for this kinetic difference is attributed to greater charger transfer rate constant ( k ct ). The greater k ct is due to the fact that the WO 3 electrodes have a smaller Helmholtz layer capacitance ( C H ), a larger space charge layer capacitance ( C SC ), and a greater charge transfer rate constant at flatband potential ( k ct 0 ). These finding provide a better understanding of the photocarrier transfer dynamics and may enlighten rational design on exploiting the metal oxide semiconductors to achieve a higher solar conversion efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: