Why the study?
Does 111In-labeled Amberlite IR-12OP resin pellets compare favorably to 131I-labeled fiber in assessing gastric and small bowel transit and colonic filling in healthy humans?
Does 111In-labeled Amberlite IR-12OP resin pellets compare favorably to 131I-labeled fiber in assessing gastric and small bowel transit and colonic filling in healthy humans?
111In-labeled Amberlite pellets provide an excellent marker for studying gastric and small bowel transit and colonic filling in humans.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
111In-pellets support scintigraphic transit assessment in healthy subjects; leaves open validation and adoption in clinical populations.
Camilleri et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: