Why the study?
Does a very low fixed-dose combination of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduce blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
Does a very low fixed-dose combination of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduce blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension?
A once-daily very low dose fixed combination of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide is effective and well tolerated for lowering blood pressure in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports low-dose MO/HCTZ for mild-moderate hypertension; confirms efficacy of very-low-dose fixed ACEI/diuretic combinations.
The antihypertensive and metabolic effects of a fixed combination of very low dose of moexipril (MO), an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were tested in a multicenter, placebo (PBO) controlled, double-blind, parallel study of men (M) and women (W) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After 4 weeks of PBO treatment, 223 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) of 95-114 mm Hg and sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) < or =200 mm Hg, inclusive, were randomized to PBO (114 patients: M, 56; W, 58) and MO/HCTZ 3.75/6.25 mg (109 patients: M, 58; W, 51) given once daily and followed up for 12 weeks. The fixed combination MO/HCTZ, 3.75/6.25 mg, reduced SSBP/SDBP -7.6/-7.6 mm Hg (M, -8.5/-8.0; W, -6.3/-7.0), versus PBO, +0.2/-3.9 mm Hg (M, -1.9/-3.4; W, +1.1/-4.4); p < 0.05. Also, 54% of patients receiving MO/HCTZ, 3.75/6.25 mg/day, had good blood pressure response (SDBP < or =90 mm Hg, or > or =10 mm Hg decrease from baseline), versus 28% for PBO (p < 0.001). The clinical and metabolic side effects were minor and not different between MO/HCTZ and PBO. The results of this study indicate (a) a once-daily very low dose fixed combination of MO/HCTZ is effective and well tolerated by men and women with mild to moderate essential hypertension; (b) it is almost devoid of clinical and metabolic side effects; and (c) the safety profile was similar in men and women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrysant et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: