Circulating PCSK9 levels are significantly associated with arterial stiffness (measured by pulse wave velocity) in healthy individuals, independent of sex and menopausal status.
Background Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) circulating levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between circulating levels of PCSK 9 and arterial stiffness, an early instrumental biomarker of cardiovascular disease risk, in a large sample of overall healthy participants. Methods and Results From the historical cohort of the Brisighella Heart Study, after exclusion of active smokers, participants in secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease, and patients in treatment with statins or vasodilating agents, we selected 227 premenopausal women and 193 age‐matched men and 460 postmenopausal women and 416 age‐matched men. In these participants, we evaluated the correlation between PCSK 9 plasma circulating levels and pulse wave velocity. Postmenopausal women showed higher PCSK 9 levels (309.9±84.1 ng/mL) compared with the other groups ( P <0.001). Older men had significant higher levels than younger men (283.2±75.6 versus 260.9±80.4 ng/mL; P =0.008). In the whole sample, pulse wave velocity was predicted mainly by age (B=0.116, 95% CI 0.96–0.127, P <0.001), PCSK 9 (B=0.014, 95% CI 0.011–0.016, P <0.001), and serum uric acid (B=0.313, 95% CI 0.024–0.391, P =0.026). Physical activity, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were not associated with pulse wave velocity ( P >0.05).By considering the subgroups described, age and PCSK 9 levels were mainly associated with pulse wave velocity, which also correlated with serum uric acid in postmenopausal women. Conclusions In the Brisighella Heart Study cohort, circulating PCSK 9 is significantly related to arterial stiffness, independent of sex and menopausal status in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruscica et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: