Automated Written Corrective Feedback in EFL context

Anano Chang

doi:10.48321/d13320141e

August 10, 2026Open Access

Automated Written Corrective Feedback in EFL context

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The research examines how Chinese EFL university students engage with automated written corrective feedback from an online platform.
Investigation of user engagement with the Pigai online writing feedback platform
Focus on Chinese university students learning English as a foreign language
Analysis of feedback effectiveness and interaction patterns
Students showed improved writing skills with the use of automated feedback.
Engagement levels varied, highlighting the importance of user interaction with technology.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Investigates automated written corrective feedback in EFL settings, highlighting its role in language learning.

Abstract

This study investigates how Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) university students engage with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Pigai, an online writing feedback platform developed by Beijing Cikuu Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (n.d.) that is currently deployed in nearly 1,000 Chinese universities.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Anano Chang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c208206a85aed514b73de https://doi.org/10.48321/d13320141e

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Automated Written Corrective Feedback in EFL context

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Automated Written Corrective Feedback in EFL context

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading