Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates reduced warming temperatures reducing energy consumption in craniotomy, indicating potential benefits.
Despite their well-known efficacy, forced-air warming during operations has its drawbacks, mainly high energy consumption and risk of hyperthermia. We therefore investigated two warming strategies in a prospective randomized study with the aim of reducing the incidence of hyperthermia without increasing the risk of intraoperative hypothermia. In the standard of care group temperature of the forced-air warmer was reduced to 32 °C when core temperature reached 37.3 °C. In the modified warming group this reduction was performed when core temperature reached 36.5 °C. The difference in the duration of normothermia between standard of care and the modified warming strategy was estimated to be 3.9% (90%-CI: 0.8% to 7.1%) and was within the predefined equivalence bounds of ± 20% ( p < 0.001). In both treatment groups no intraoperative hyperthermia ocurred. Average energy consumption per hour was significantly higher in the standard-of-care group (0.51 kWh/h; 95%-CI: 0.47–0.56) compared with the modified warming strategy (0.40 kWh/h; 95%-CI: 0.35–0.46; p = 0.002). By strictly limiting the heat supply, intraoperative hyperthermia can be safely prevented during craniotomies. A lower threshold value of 36.5 °C allows for a meaningful reduction in energy consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bräuer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: