Investigates kindlin-3 dynamics in neutrophil adhesion during stress myelopoiesis, suggesting it may aid recovery post-HSC transplantation.
Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency syndrome type III (LAD-III) is characterized by recurrent infections and is caused by FERMT3 gene mutations. FERMT3 encodes two isoforms, a standard kindlin-3 and a longer splicing variant, which differs by the addition of four residues Ile-Pro-Arg-Arg (IPRR) in the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (kindlin-3-IPRR). Previous studies suggested that kindlin-3-IPRR was dysfunctional in inducing neutrophil adhesion, attributed to altered phospholipid binding of the IPRR-containing PH domain. Here we show that kindlin-3-IPRR is fully functional in activating β2 integrins and promotes neutrophil adhesion. The IPRR insert enhances phospholipid binding in vitro and promotes association of kindlin-3 with the plasma membrane. By analyzing RNA sequencing datasets of neutropoiesis, we show that the kindlin-3 short isoform lacking IPRR is highly expressed in neutrophil precursors but downregulated in mature neutrophils. In contrast, a higher proportion of the long isoform was detected in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and mature neutrophils. Kindlin-3-IPRR supports robust adhesion of HSCs. We propose that kindlin-3-IPRR may be crucial in conditions requiring rapid neutrophil mobilization. Indeed, kindlin-3 splicing is altered in neutrophils from patients undergoing stress myelopoiesis after exposure to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or HSC transplantation (HSC-T) compared with healthy donors. During stress myelopoiesis induced by G-CSF treatment, the kindlin-3 long isoform is selectively upregulated in mature neutrophils, coinciding with enhanced β2 integrin activation. These findings support a model in which alternative splicing of FERMT3 dynamically fine-tunes integrin activation and leukocyte adhesion during hematopoietic stress, with potential implications for monitoring hematopoietic recovery after HSC transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: