Randomized trial shows improved encryption efficiency and security with public re-randomization in cryptographic systems, suggesting enhanced data privacy.
Anonymity infrastructures such as mix networks, anonymous storage, and privacy-preserving replication rely on public re-randomization : any party holding only public information can transform a ciphertext into a fresh-looking encryption of the same plaintext, hiding the linkage between the two. Classical ElGamal-based solutions are broken by quantum adversaries, while existing lattice-based alternatives carry very large ciphertexts with unanalyzed noise growth, rely on heavyweight homomorphic-encryption stacks with approximate (rounded) decryption, or lack a precise analysis of how many re-randomizations are safe. We address this gap with a practical Ring Learning with Errors (Ring-LWE) public-key encryption scheme supporting public re-randomization without ciphertext growth. Our construction is Lyubashevsky–Peikert–Regev/Fan–Vercauteren (LPR/BFV)-style encryption over R=Z[x]/(xⁿ+1) R = Z [ x ] / ( x n + 1 ) with $$n=4096$$ n = 4096 , engineered around a two-limb Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) modulus q=t· q₂ q = t · q 2 with 32-bit primes. Embedding plaintext as Δ M = q₂ M Δ M = q 2 M makes the message vanish modulo q₂ q 2 , so the q₂ q 2 -limb carries only the decryption noise, enabling exact message recovery without rounding. We prove correctness with explicit decryption-failure bounds that remain valid under repeated re-randomization, via an aggregation lemma showing that arbitrarily many re-randomizations affect decryption only through a single aggregated randomness triple. We also prove that two-limb ciphertexts are pseudorandom (indistinguishable from uniform, IND$) under Decision Ring-LWE over the combined modulus $$q=tq_2$$ q = t q 2 ; security against chosen-plaintext attack (IND-CPA) and re-randomization unlinkability follow. A constant-time Rust implementation encrypts in 0.80 ms, re-randomizes in 0.51 ms, and decrypts in 0.21 ms per 64 KiB ciphertext carrying 15.5 KiB of payload on a fixed-frequency 3.8 GHz CPU—on par with a modulus-matched Microsoft SEAL baseline—and passes timing-leakage tests. Empirical noise simulations validate the analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vodenicarevic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: