Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of NETest2.0, a 51-neuroendocrine tumor (NET)–specific gene whole blood assay (NETest2.0) for monitoring surgical patients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEPNET). Background: GEPNETs are challenging regarding postoperative surveillance and monitoring for recurrence or progression. Methods: Blood samples were collected at baseline and during follow-up, and NETest2.0 was measured (scored 0–100; cutoff normal: <50) in 82 consecutive patients with GEPNET. Scores were correlated with follow-up and disease status, including no evidence of disease, stable disease, recurrent disease, and progressive disease. Results: Pancreatic NET (n = 29): median age, 57 (26–81) years, M:F (17:12), G1: 19, G2: 8, G3: 2, stages I to III (n = 18), and stage IV (n = 11). Median follow-up, 122 (4–163) months; 7 (24%) died. NETest2.0 correlated with outcomes and was significantly higher in those who died ( P = 0.0215). Small bowel NET (n = 53): median age, 66 (36–86) years, M:F (22:31), G1: 45, G2: 8, G3: 0, stages I to III (n = 25), and stage IV (n = 28). Median follow-up, 83 (12–157) months; thirteen (25%) died. NETest2.0 correlated with outcomes and was significantly higher in those who died ( P = 0.0011). Scores ≥50 were significantly associated with recurrent disease ( P = 0.0013). Scores ≥65 were associated with progression and poorer overall survival. Conclusions: NETest2.0 accurately identified disease status and correlated with clinical outcomes. Patients were stratified into molecular remission, stable disease, and high-risk progression states. Low scores (<50) identified surgical patients unlikely to recur; scores ≥65 identified individuals at increased risk for progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frilling et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: