Why the study?
Cryoballoon ablation efficacy depends on duration, but prolonged duration may increase extracardiac complications, leaving the optimal additional ablation duration after acute PVI unclear.
Does an additional ablation duration of 150 seconds reduce reconnection/dormant conduction compared to 90 or 120 seconds in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing cryoballoon ablation?
Does an additional ablation duration of 150 seconds reduce reconnection/dormant conduction compared to 90 or 120 seconds in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing cryoballoon ablation?
An additional cryoballoon ablation duration of 150 seconds after time-to-isolation significantly reduces dormant conduction and the need for repeat procedures in paroxysmal AF without increasing complications.
Additional ablation duration after PVI may affect reconnection; leaves open the optimal time balancing efficacy and extracardiac risk.
INTRODUCTION: Efficacy of cryoballoon ablation depends on balloon-tissue contact and ablation duration. Prolonged duration may increase extracardiac complications. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal additional ablation duration after acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to three groups according to additional ablation duration (90, 120, or 150 seconds) after acute PVI (time-to-isolation). Primary outcome was reconnection/dormant conduction (DC) after a 30 minutes waiting period. If present, additional 240 seconds ablations were performed. Ablations without time-to-isolation <90 seconds, esophageal temperature <18°C or decreased phrenic nerve capture were aborted. Patients were followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Seventy-five study patients (60 ± 11 years, 48 male) were included. Reconnection/DC per vein significantly decreased (22%, 6% and 4%) while aborted ablations remained stable (respectively 4, 5, and 7%) among the 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups. A shorter cryo-application time, longer time-to-isolation, higher balloon temperature and unsuccessful ablations predicted reconnection/DC. Freedom of atrial fibrillation was, respectively, 52, 56, and 72% in 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups ( P = 0.27), while repeated procedures significantly decreased from 36% to 4% ( P = 0.041) in the longer duration group compared to shorter duration group (150 seconds vs 90 seconds group). In multivariate Cox-regression only reconnection/DC predicted recurrence. CONCLUSION: Prolonging ablation duration after time-to-isolation significantly decreased reconnection/DC and repeated procedures, while recurrences and complications rates were similar. In a time-to-isolation approach, an additional ablation of 150 seconds ablation is the most appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keçe et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: