Why the study?
Patients with CIEDs likely represent a high-risk group for COVID-19, and these devices can be interrogated to provide information regarding activity, heart rate parameters, and respiratory rate.
Can interrogation of cardiac implantable electronic devices reveal physiologic abnormalities prior to symptom onset in patients with COVID-19?
Can interrogation of cardiac implantable electronic devices reveal physiologic abnormalities prior to symptom onset in patients with COVID-19?
Physiologic changes such as decreased activity and increased respiratory rate can be detected via CIED interrogation prior to the onset of COVID-19 symptoms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series of CIED patients with COVID-19 is hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Background: COVID-19 has affected individuals across the globe, and those with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) likely represent a high-risk group. These devices can be interrogated to reveal information about the patient activity, heart rate parameters, and respiratory rate. Case summary: Four patients with CIEDs and left ventricular dysfunction were admitted to a single institution for COVID-19 infection. Each patient survived hospitalization, and none required intensive care. Retrospectively, CIED interrogation revealed each patient had decreased activity level prior to their reporting COVID-19 symptoms. Similarly, respiratory rate increased before symptom onset for three of the patients, while one did not have these data available. Of the three patients with heart rate variability (HRV) available, two had decreased HRV before they developed symptoms. After hospital discharge, these parameters returned to their baseline. Discussion: This case series suggests physiologic changes identifiable through interrogation of CIEDs may occur prior to the reported onset of COVID-19 symptoms. These data may provide objective evidence on which to base more sensitive assessments of infectious risk when performing contact tracing in communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delfiner et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: