Why the study?
Small reference vessel diameters predict ischemic events after coronary stenting, making patients with small vessel disease at high bleeding risk precluding long-term DAPT an especially high-risk subgroup.
Does the presence of small vessel disease (RVD ≤2.5 mm) increase the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in high bleeding risk patients treated with a zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1-month DAPT compared to those without small vessel disease?
Does the presence of small vessel disease (RVD ≤2.5 mm) increase the risk of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in high bleeding risk patients treated with a zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1-month DAPT compared to those without small vessel disease?
In high bleeding risk patients treated with a zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1-month DAPT, those with small vessel disease had comparable 12-month ischemic and bleeding outcomes to those with larger caliber vessels.
Background Small reference vessel diameters (RVDs) are a predictor of ischemic events after coronary stenting. Among patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) precluding long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), those with small vessel disease (SVD) constitute an especially high-risk subgroup. Here, we evaluated the results of a durable-polymer, coronary zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) for the treatment of patients with SVD at HBR with 1-month DAPT. Methods In the prospective, multicenter Onyx ONE (One-Month DAPT) Clear study, 1506 patients at HBR treated with a ZES that discontinued DAPT at 30 days were included. The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of lesions with an RVD of ≤2.5 mm (SVD group, as determined by the angiographic core laboratory) were compared with patients without SVD. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction between 1 and 12 months. Results Small vessel diameter treatment was performed in 489 (32.5%) patients. Patients with SVD were more likely to be women, have undergone a previous percutaneous intervention, and have multivessel coronary artery disease than patients without SVD. There were no significant differences in lesion, device, or procedural success between the groups. The Kaplan-Meier rate estimate of the primary end point was 8.5% and 6.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively ( P = .425). No significant differences were found in any secondary end point. The Kaplan-Meier rate of stent thrombosis was 0.6% and 0.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively ( P = .50). Conclusions Among patients at HBR treated with a ZES and 1-month DAPT, those with SVD had favorable 12-month ischemic and bleeding outcomes, which were comparable with those of patients with larger caliber vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: