Why the study?
This review discusses the prevention of complications after PCI with a focus on antithrombotic therapy and examines future perspectives of PCI.
This review highlights the importance of tailored antithrombotic therapy and technological advances in minimizing complications and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention.
DAPT remains essential post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis in CHD; leaves open optimal duration and regimens in contemporary practice.
Antiplatelet therapy is an essential part of cardiovascular prevention in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Damage to the vascular wall caused by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is accompanied by extensive platelet activation followed by inevitable risk of thrombosis within implanted stent both in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those with chronic CHD especially before endothelization is completed. Effective prevention of ischaemic complications necessitates dual antiplatelet therapy including its combination with anticoagulation therapy. Duration of the combined therapy is determined by clinical scenario as well as balancing the risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic events. Risk assessment is an integral part of patient management. Technological advances in the field of coronary interventions aim to assess atherosclerotic lesions precisely in terms of requirement of revascularization, minimize damage to the vascular wall, promote endothelization, and allow shortening of antithrombotic therapy without losing long-term effectiveness of PCI and increasing the rate of stent thrombosis. The current review discusses prevention of complications after PCI with focus on antithrombotic therapy as well as future perspectives of PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dzeshka et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: