Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performance of the Siemens SMART CCD (charge-coupled device) area detector has been tested to assess its suitability for accurate electron-density (ED) determination. 92043 diffraction intensities (14701 unique reflections, 65 h experiment) have been collected on a reference crystal of methyl 2-[(4-butyl-2-methyl-6-oxo-5-{4-[2-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]benzyl }-1,2-dihydropyrimidin-1-yl)methyl]-3-thiophenecarboxylate (C30H30N6O3S) at T = 120 K and compared with those (51485, 14699 unique, 600 h) obtained from a previous collection at T = 18 K on the same crystal using a diffractometer equipped with a conventional detector. Results from spherical and multipolar refinements (agreement factors, standard uncertainties of refined variables and geometries after correction for thermal motion) have also been compared. The λ/2 contamination, which affects area detectors but not well tuned conventional detectors, has been carefully investigated and proved to be a negligible source of errors (which can anyway be easily corrected). The encouraging results of this test prove that area detectors are also well suited for charge-density studies, offering a cheap and fast data-collection mode, without loss of accuracy, which can be exploited for ED studies on large systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macchi et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: