Key result
Coronary CMR vessel wall contrast enhancement is linked to ~1.8-fold higher CNR in CAD and SLE.
Observational (n=75)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement identifies vascular injury in coronary artery disease and lupus, indicating a viable noninvasive marker of coronary remodeling.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the feasibility of visual and quantitative assessment of coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement (CE) for detection of symptomatic atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) and subclinical coronary vasculitis in autoimmune inflammatory disease (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]), as well as the association with aortic stiffness, an established marker of risk. BACKGROUND: Coronary CE by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a novel noninvasive approach to visualize gadolinium contrast uptake within the coronary artery vessel wall. METHODS: A total of 75 subjects (CAD: n = 25; SLE: n = 27; control: n = 23) underwent CMR imaging using a 3-T clinical scanner. Coronary arteries were visualized by a T2-prepared steady state free precession technique. Coronary wall CE was visualized using inversion-recovery T1 weighted gradient echo sequence 40 min after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol. Proximal coronary segments were visually examined for distribution of CE and quantified for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and total CE area. RESULTS: Coronary CE was prevalent in patients (93%, n = 42) with a diffuse pattern for SLE and a patchy/regional distribution in CAD patients. Compared with control subjects, CNR values and total CE area in patients with CAD and SLE were significantly higher (mean CNR: 3.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.8 ± 2.0, respectively; p < 0.001; total CE area: median 0.8 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.6 to 1.2] vs. 3.2 [IQR: 2.6 to 4.0] vs. 3.3 [IQR: 1.9 to 4.5], respectively; p < 0.001). Both measures were positively associated with aortic stiffness (CNR: r = 0.61, p < 0.01; total CE area: 0.36, p = 0.03), hypercholesterolemia (r = 0.68, p < 0.001; r = 0.61, p < 0.001) and hypertension (r = 0.40, p < 0.01; r = 0.32, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that quantification of coronary CE by CNR and total CE area is feasible for detection of subclinical and clinical uptake of gadolinium within the coronary vessel wall. Coronary vessel wall CE may become an instrumental novel direct marker of vessel wall injury and remodeling in subpopulations at risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varma et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Symptomatic atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=75). Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement (CE) imaging by 3-T CMR vs. Control subjects was evaluated on Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and total contrast enhancement (CE) area (p=<0.001). Coronary vessel wall contrast enhancement by CMR showed significantly higher mean CNR in CAD (6.9) and SLE (6.8) patients compared with controls (3.9; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: