Why the study?
Does chronic LVAD support lead to aortic valve cusp fusion in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy?
Does chronic LVAD support lead to aortic valve cusp fusion in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy?
Chronic LVAD support is associated with aortic valve cusp fusion in approximately 25% of patients, which may complicate myocardial recovery and weaning from the device.
May impede LVAD weaning in bridge-to-recovery; hypothesis-generating for valve surveillance in chronic support.
Favorable long-term patient outcome after insertion of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to recovery or destination therapy for the treatment of end-stage cardiomyopathy is adversely affected by pathophysiologic changes affecting the heart. Alterations in the native aortic valve apparatus, specifically aortic valve cusp fusion, is an example of such a phenomenon and may especially affect patients in cases of bridge to recovery, a rare but reported event. A retrospective review of the last 33 LVAD placements at our institution was conducted, including reviews of operative reports and pathologic examinations of the native hearts. Seven hearts were found to have varying degrees of aortic valve cusp fusion after chronic LVAD support (63-1, 339 days). Five of these patients had native aortic valves, and two had bioprosthetic valves. The left ventricular outflow tracts in two patients were surgically occluded at the time of LVAD insertion. Aortic valve cusp fusion occurs in roughly 25% of patients on chronic LVAD support. This phenomenon may prove to be clinically significant by creating a potential source of emboli and infection. In addition, in the case of myocardial recovery, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction could limit parallel flow and produce suprasystemic ventricular pressures that in turn would elevate left ventricular end diastolic pressures. The latter may contribute to further myocardial injury, ultimately limiting the ability of an otherwise recovered heart to be weaned from LVAD support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baradarian et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: