Why the study?
How accurate are junior doctors in the accident and emergency department at detecting ECG abnormalities compared to cardiologists?
How accurate are junior doctors in the accident and emergency department at detecting ECG abnormalities compared to cardiologists?
Junior doctors in the accident and emergency department miss approximately 20% of ECG abnormalities, but only 4.4% of clinically significant ones.
Junior doctor ECG errors in emergency care warrant selective cardiologist review; leaves open training impact on significant misses.
The object of this study was to assess the ability of junior doctors in the accident and emergency department to detect electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities. The ECG's performed in this department were monitored over a 4 week period. The initial diagnosis by the accident and emergency doctor was compared with the report from the cardiologist on 126 ECG's which showed abnormalities. The error rate was 19.8%. Of those abnormalities which were graded as clinically significant only 2 (4.4%) were missed. The danger of missing acute changes is emphasized and proposals discussed which may reduce their frequency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: