Why the study?
The study aimed to examine the contribution of subjective cognitive decline to reduce the number of beta-amyloid PET scans needed to recruit amyloid-positive clinically normal individuals for clinical trials.
Does subjective cognitive decline (SCD) endorsement predict high global β-amyloid (Aβ+) on PET scans in clinically normal individuals?
Does subjective cognitive decline (SCD) endorsement predict high global β-amyloid (Aβ+) on PET scans in clinically normal individuals?
Collecting subjective cognitive decline information is a feasible method to enrich clinical trial recruitment for individuals likely on the Alzheimer's disease trajectory by reducing the number of required screening PET scans.
SCD may modestly enrich Aβ+ trial recruitment; leaves open whether it should guide clinical screening.
Introduction We aimed to examine the contribution of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) to reduce the number of β‐amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography scans required for recruiting Aβ+ clinically normal individuals in clinical trials. Methods Three independent cohorts (890 clinically normal: 72 yrs ± 6.7; Female: 43.4%; SCD+: 24%; apolipoprotein E [ APOE ] ε4+: 28.5%; Aβ+: 32%) were used. SCD was dichotomized from one question. Using logistic regression, we classified Aβ+ using the SCD dichotomy, APOE ε4, sex, and age. Results SCD increased odds of Aβ+ by 1.58 relative to non‐SCD. Female APOE ε4 carriers with SCD exhibited higher odds of Aβ+ (OR = 3.34), whereas male carriers with SCD showed a weaker, opposing effect (OR = 0.37). SCD endorsement reduces the number of Aβ positron emission tomography scans to recruit Aβ+ individuals by 13% and by 9% if APOE ε4 status is known. Conclusion SCD helps to classify those with high Aβ, even beyond the substantial effect of APOE genotype. Collecting SCD is a feasible method for targeting recruitment for those likely on the AD trajectory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckley et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: