Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Due to the invasiveness of direct techniques and problems that constrain the use of popular indirect techniques during very heavy (non-steady-state) exercise, measurements of maximal cardiac output are seldom included in studies of exercise. The acetylene-rebreathing technique is well-suited for maximal exercise; however, until recent technological advances, difficulties involved in collecting and measuring alveolar acetylene samples have restricted its use. We compared cardiac output values measured via the acetylene-rebreathing technique (QA) (modified for use with a mass spectrometer) and the dye-dilution technique (QD) at rest and during light to maximal exercise in six moderately active males. Although QA consistently underestimated QD, the two techniques showed a significant correlation of 0.87 throughout all levels of exercise. During maximal exercise, QA and QD values were not significantly different (24.7 and 26.7 l X min-1, respectively). Modifications in the QA technique that reduce potential sources of error were also examined. We conclude that the acetylene-rebreathing technique, modified for use with a mass spectrometer, is a simple and valid procedure for measuring maximal cardiac output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SMYTH et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: