Why the study?
The study investigated the sensitivity of bar velocity, isometric mid-thigh pull, heart rate variability, perceived recovery scale, and step counts for tracking muscular fatigue time-course after strenuous resistance exercise.
Which parameters are sensitive for tracking muscular fatigue time-course after strenuous acute lower limb resistance exercise in healthy men?
Which parameters are sensitive for tracking muscular fatigue time-course after strenuous acute lower limb resistance exercise in healthy men?
The perceived recovery scale is a sensitive and practical tool for tracking the time-course of muscular fatigue following strenuous lower limb resistance exercise.
May guide athlete fatigue monitoring; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the sensitivity of back squat bar velocity, isometric mid-thigh pull, heart rate variability parameters, perceived recovery scale and step counts for tracking the muscular fatigue time-course (reduction in countermovement jump [CMJ] performance) after strenuous acute lower limb resistance exercise. Sixteen healthy men performed heart rate variability assessment, perceived recovery scale, CMJ, back squat bar velocity, isometric mid-thigh pull, and daily step counts before and 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post a strenuous acute lower limb resistance exercise (8×10 repetitions). The CMJ height decreased at 24 and 48 h after exercise session (p≤0.017), evidencing the muscular fatigue. The perceived recovery scale presented lower values compared to baseline until 72 h after exercise session (p<0.001 for all). The heart rate variability parameters and step counts were not significantly different across time. At 24 h post, only mean force of mid-thigh pull was decreased (p=0.044), while at 48 h post, only peak force of mid-thigh pull was decreased (p=0.020). On the last day (72 h), only bar velocity (mean) presented reduction (p=0.022). Therefore, the perceived recovery scale was the only variable sensible to tracking muscular fatigue, i. e. presenting a similar time-course to CMJ height.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brisola et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: