Why the study?
The role of total arch replacement in patients with acute type A aortic dissection has been debated, with multiple clinical and anatomical factors affecting decision-making.
Does total arch replacement improve outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection?
Does total arch replacement improve outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection?
This review summarizes the outcomes and techniques of total arch replacement in patients with acute type A aortic dissection to guide clinical decision-making.
Individualized TAR decisions in ATAD persist; review leaves optimal strategy open for higher-level evidence.
The role of total arch replacement (TAR) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAD) has been much debated. There are numerous factors that contribute to the clinical decision-making process. These include patient cohort, clinical status of the patient, aortic anatomy, dissection morphology, and expertise of the surgeon and the center. In this review, we summarize early and late outcomes of TAR in ATAD patients and discuss the specific patient populations that may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach at the time of the initial acute presentation. We discuss techniques for TAR, differences in aortic remodeling, and long-term aortic prognosis of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attia et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: