Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Significant differences in movement quality at term are reported in high-risk preterm (n = 18), low-risk preterm (n = 21) and term (n = 20) infants. Movement quality was judged using 2-minute video collection of general movements; three parameters of movement quality could be assessed reliably in a semiquantitative way: fluency, spatiotemporal variability and sequencing. The parameters fluency and variability correlated highly with each other (r = 0.47-0.99) while their correlations with sequencing were less (r = 0.42-0.67). Significant differences on all quality parameters were noted between term, low-risk preterm and high-risk preterm infants (p < 0.001-0.05). The findings indicate a significant impact of prematurity per se and brain damage on movement quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakebeeke et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: