This research analyzes the impacts of 'Make in India' and 'Viksit Bharat 2047' on employment and sustainability in India, suggesting integrated policy approaches.
India’s economic trajectory is marked by ambitious policy initiatives aimed at transforming its manufacturing landscape, generating widespread employment, and achieving sustainable development. This paper undertakes a detailed analysis of two pivotal government visions: "Make in India" (launched in 2014) and "Viksit Bharat 2047" (the vision for a developed India by its centenary of independence). It critically examines the evolution of manufacturing policies, their impact on employment generation, and their alignment with the broader goals of sustainable development. Drawing on a comprehensive review of extant literature, policy documents, and economic reports, the paper elucidates the objectives, achievements, and persistent challenges associated with Make in India, particularly in fostering a robust domestic manufacturing base, attracting foreign investment, and enhancing global competitiveness. Furthermore, it delves into the intricate relationship between manufacturing growth and the quality and quantity of employment, exploring issues such as skill development, formalization, and the implications of automation. The core argument posits that while Make in India laid foundational groundwork, the journey towards Viksit Bharat 2047 necessitates a more integrated, human-centric, and environmentally conscious approach. The paper articulates how the vision of Viksit Bharat 2047 expands upon previous industrialization efforts by embedding principles of green growth, social equity, and technological innovation. It investigates the synergies and potential trade-offs between rapid industrialization, job creation, and environmental stewardship, proposing policy recommendations to navigate these complexities. Ultimately, this research provides a nuanced understanding of India's developmental aspirations, highlighting the critical role of manufacturing and employment in achieving a prosperous, equitable, and sustainable future for all Indians by 2047.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talukdar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: