Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Military personnel and athletes increasingly use non-invasive methods to estimate body core temperature during heat acclimation. This study determined the responsiveness of the CALERA Research Sensor (CRS) to changes in resting and end-exercise body core temperature induced by heat acclimation as well as the criterion validity for determining the thermal dose, defined as time spent with a body core temperature ≥ 38.5 ° C. Fifteen participants completed a nine-day controlled-hyperthermia heat acclimation protocol. Body core temperature was continuously monitored prior to and during heat exposures using both the CRS (T crs ) and a rectal temperature (T re ) probe. This study assessed responsiveness and criterion validity using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additionally, the analyses included a linear mixed model to further analyze responsiveness. T crs showed limited responsiveness to heat acclimation-induced changes in resting and end-exercise T re with wide limits of agreement (± 0.32 ° C), proportional bias (indicating increasing underestimation with larger adaptations), and low ICC (≤0.18). Additionally, resting and end-exercise T re decreased to a greater extent than T crs , which showed a downward trend during end-exercise over the nine-day heat acclimation (P < 0.001). The CRS showed limited criterion validity for estimating thermal dose, with wide limits of agreement (± 20 min), proportional bias (indicating increasing underestimation at higher thermal doses), and low ICC of 0.35. These results indicate that the current version of the CRS underestimates both heat acclimation-induced changes in T re and the thermal dose during controlled hyperthermia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogaard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: