Key result
The microINR point-of-care system demonstrated high accuracy compared to the Sysmex CS-2100i analyser, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P<.0001) and 95.7% clinical agreement.
Why the study?
Does the microINR point-of-care system provide accurate and precise INR measurements compared to standard venous laboratory testing in patients on warfarin?
Observational (n=210)
Does the microINR point-of-care system provide accurate and precise INR measurements compared to standard venous laboratory testing in patients on warfarin?
Effect estimate: correlation coefficient 0.96
p-value: p=<.0001
The microINR point-of-care system provides accurate and precise INR measurements comparable to standard laboratory testing for monitoring warfarin therapy.
microINR accuracy supports potential use in warfarin monitoring; leaves open prospective outcome validation before routine adoption.
Introduction Point‐of‐care International Normalised Ratio ( INR ) testing is used frequently. We evaluated the micro INR ® POC system for accuracy, precision and measurement repeatability, and investigated instrument and test chip variability and error rates. Methods Venous blood INR s of 210 patients on warfarin were obtained with Thromborel ® S on the Sysmex CS ‐2100i ® analyser and compared with capillary blood micro INR ® values. Precision was assessed using control materials. Measurement repeatability was calculated on 51 duplicate finger‐prick INR s. Triplicate finger‐prick INR s using three different instruments (30 patients) and three different test chip lots (29 patients) were used to evaluate instrument and test chip variability. Results Linear regression analysis of micro INR ® and Sysmex CS 2100i ® values showed a correlation coefficient of 0.96 ( P < .0001) and a positive proportional bias of 4.4%. Dosage concordance was 93.8% and clinical agreement 95.7%. All acceptance criteria based on ISO standard 17593:2007 system accuracy requirements were met. Control material coefficients of variation ( CV ) varied from 6.2% to 16.7%. The capillary blood measurement repeatability CV was 7.5%. No significant instrument ( P = .93) or test chip ( P = .81) variability was found, and the error rate was low (2.8%). Conclusion The micro INR ® instrument is accurate and precise for monitoring warfarin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joubert et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Warfarin therapy (n=210). microINR POC system vs. Sysmex CS-2100i analyser was evaluated on Correlation between microINR and Sysmex CS-2100i values (correlation coefficient 0.96, p=<.0001). The microINR point-of-care system demonstrated high accuracy compared to the Sysmex CS-2100i analyser, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P<.0001) and 95.7% clinical agreement.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: