Key result
Moderate-to-high sympathetic activation via lower body negative pressure (-50 and -70 Torr) decreased internal carotid and vertebral artery blood flow (e.g., -27.6% VA flow at -70 Torr).
Why the study?
Does graded sympathetic activation via lower body negative pressure preferentially reduce internal carotid artery blood flow compared to vertebral artery blood flow?
Does graded sympathetic activation via lower body negative pressure preferentially reduce internal carotid artery blood flow compared to vertebral artery blood flow?
Moderate-to-high reflex-mediated sympathetic activation causes similar magnitudes of vasoconstriction in both the anterior and posterior cerebral circulations, indicating a lack of regional heterogeneity in response to sympathoexcitation.
Sympathetic activation induces uniform cerebral vasoconstriction; extends physiological models but leaves open clinical relevance in cerebrovascular disease.
The role of the sympathetic nervous system in cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation remains unclear. Previous studies have primarily measured middle cerebral artery blood velocity to assess CBF. Recently, there has been a transition toward measuring internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) blood flow using duplex Doppler ultrasound. Given that the VA supplies autonomic control centers in the brainstem, we hypothesized that graded sympathetic activation via lower body negative pressure (LBNP) would reduce ICA but not VA blood flow. ICA and VA blood flow were measured during two protocols: protocol 1, low-to-moderate LBNP (−10, −20, −30, and −40 Torr) and protocol 2, moderate-to-high LBNP (−30, −50, and −70 Torr). ICA and VA blood flow, diameter, and blood velocity were unaffected up to −40 LBNP. However, −50 and −70 LBNP evoked reductions in ICA and VA blood flow [e.g., −70 LBNP: percent change (%∆)VA-baseline = −27.6 ± 3.0] that were mediated by decreases in both diameter and velocity (e.g., −70 LBNP: %∆VA-baseline diameter = −7.5 ± 1.9 and %∆VA-baseline velocity = −13.6 ± 1.7), which were comparable between vessels. Since hyperventilation during −70 LBNP reduced end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), this decrease in [Formula: see text] was matched via voluntary hyperventilation. Reductions in ICA and VA blood flow during hyperventilation alone were significantly smaller than during −70 LBNP and were primarily mediated by decreases in velocity (%∆VA-baseline velocity = −8.6 ± 2.4 and %∆VA-baseline diameter = −0.05 ± 0.56). These data demonstrate that both ICA and VA were unaffected by low-to-moderate sympathetic activation, whereas robust reflex-mediated sympathoexcitation caused similar magnitudes of vasoconstriction in both arteries. Thus, contrary to our hypothesis, the ICA was not preferentially vasoconstricted by sympathetic activation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrates that moderate-to-high reflex-mediated sympathetic activation with lower body negative pressure (LBNP) decreases internal carotid artery and vertebral artery blood flow via reductions in both vessel diameter and blood velocity. This vasoconstriction was primarily sympathetically mediated as voluntary hyperventilation alone, to isolate the effect of decreases in end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide that occurred during LBNP, resulted in a significantly smaller vasoconstriction. In contrast to our hypothesis, these data indicate a lack of heterogeneity between the anterior and posterior cerebral circulations in response to sympathoexcitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2018) studied this question. Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) vs. Baseline and voluntary hyperventilation was evaluated on Internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) blood flow, diameter, and velocity. Moderate-to-high sympathetic activation via lower body negative pressure (-50 and -70 Torr) decreased internal carotid and vertebral artery blood flow (e.g., -27.6% VA flow at -70 Torr).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Applied Physiology