Why the study?
Unsatisfactory results with synthetic materials in cardiac reconstruction led to the use of biological tissues such as autologous or animal pericardium as patch material, prompting a review of its role in acquired cardiac lesions.
Pericardium is a versatile and effective biological tissue for cardiac reconstruction in acquired heart diseases, though long-term calcification remains a limitation.
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of cardiac structures has been the goal of many surgeons even before the advent of open-heart procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. Unsatisfactory results with synthetic materials has switched the attention to biological tissues, among which pericardium, either autologous or of animal origin, has been widely used as patch material. METHODS: We have reviewed the literature to assess the effective role of pericardial tissue in the correction of various acquired cardiac lesions. Particularly, special attention was given not only to established techniques but also to detect any peculiar and unusual application of pericardium. RESULTS: Autologous pericardium is frequently used as patch material particularly when limited valvular lesions must be corrected, while xenograft pericardium appears particularly useful in patients with endocarditis and extensive destruction of the intracardiac structures by infection and abscesses. Pericardium is an extremely versatile material owing to its pliability and strength; however, it tends to calcify in the long term when in contact with blood, although stability of the repair is maintained in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardium plays an important role in various cardiac and aortic pathologies. Tissues resistant to fibrosis and calcification to be used as patch material are the ideal solution for more successful cardiac reconstruction procedures and will hopefully be provided by the ongoing research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martino et al. (2019) reported a review.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: