Key result
Women and physicians desire improved aftercare following preeclampsia, preferring integration into a general practitioner-led cardiovascular risk management program.
Why the study?
Preeclampsia is a risk factor for future cardiovascular events, but standardized follow-up has not been implemented in the north of the Netherlands.
Women with a history of preeclampsia and their physicians recognize a clear need for improved long-term cardiovascular risk follow-up, preferably integrated into primary care CVRM programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preferences support piloting GP-integrated post-preeclampsia care; leaves open outcome benefits pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that a history of preeclampsia is an important risk factor for future cardiovascular events. Awareness of this risk could provide opportunities for identification of women at risk, with opportunities for prevention and / or early intervention. A standardized follow-up has not yet been implemented in the north of the Netherlands. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the opinions and wishes among women and physicians about the follow-up for women with a history of preeclampsia. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 15 women and 14 physicians (5 obstetricians, 4 general practitioners, 3 vascular medicine specialists and 2 cardiologists) were performed and addressed topics about knowledge on CVR, current - and future follow-up. Women were approached through the HELLP foundation and their physicians. Physicians were approached by email. The interviews were recorded, typed and coded using ATLAS.ti software. A theoretical-driven thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Women had some knowledge about the association between preeclampsia and the increased CVR, but missed information from their health care providers. Specialists were aware of the association, but the information and advice they provided to their patients was minimal and inconsistent according to themselves. Whereas some general practitioners regarded their own knowledge as limited. There was a clear desire among women for a more extensive follow-up with specific attention to both emotional and physical consequences of preeclampsia. Physicians indicated that they preferred to see a follow up program concerning the CVR at the general practitioner as part of the already existent cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) program. CONCLUSION: Women and medical specialists consider it important to improve aftercare for women after a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Introducing these women into the CVRM program at the general practitioner is regarded as a preferred first step. Further research is warranted to establish an evidence-based guideline for the follow-up of these women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dijkhuis et al. (2020) studied History of preeclampsia (n=29). Cardiovascular risk management follow-up was evaluated on Perspectives on knowledge and needs concerning follow-up for long-term cardiovascular risks. Women and physicians desire improved aftercare following preeclampsia, preferring integration into a general practitioner-led cardiovascular risk management program.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: