Key result
Concomitant acute ischemic stroke during acute myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to no stroke (16.4% vs 6.0%; aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.72-1.78; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Contemporary data on the prevalence and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke complicating acute myocardial infarction were limited.
Does concomitant acute ischemic stroke worsen in-hospital outcomes in adult patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=11,622,528)
Yes
Does concomitant acute ischemic stroke worsen in-hospital outcomes in adult patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 1.75 (95% CI 1.72–1.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 16.4% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Acute ischemic stroke complicating acute myocardial infarction is associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality, lower rates of invasive coronary procedures, and poor functional outcomes.
May prompt closer stroke monitoring in AMI; leaves open whether interventions improve survival.
Background There are limited contemporary data prevalence and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and Results Adult (>18 years) AMI admissions using the National Inpatient Sample database (2000–2017) were evaluated for in‐hospital AIS. Outcomes of interest included in‐hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, length of stay, discharge disposition, and use of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. The discharge destination was used to classify survivors into good and poor outcomes. Of a total 11 622 528 AMI admissions, 183 896 (1.6%) had concomitant AIS. As compared with 2000, in 2017, AIS rates increased slightly among ST‐segment–elevation AMI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04–1.15]) and decreased in non–ST‐segment–elevation AMI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.46–0.49]) admissions ( P <0.001). Compared with those without, the AIS cohort was on average older, female, of non‐White race, with greater comorbidities, and higher rates of arrhythmias. The AMI‐AIS admissions received less frequent coronary angiography (46.9% versus 63.8%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (22.7% versus 41.8%) ( P <0.001). The AIS cohort had higher in‐hospital mortality (16.4% versus 6.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.72–1.78]; P <0.001), longer hospital length of stay, higher hospitalization costs, greater use of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and less frequent discharges to home (all P <0.001). Among AMI‐AIS survivors (N=153 318), 57.3% had a poor functional outcome at discharge with relatively stable temporal trends. Conclusions AIS is associated with significantly higher in‐hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes in AMI admissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aggarwal et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=11,622,528). Acute ischemic stroke vs. No acute ischemic stroke was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.72-1.78, p=<0.001). Concomitant acute ischemic stroke during acute myocardial infarction was associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to no stroke (16.4% vs 6.0%; aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.72-1.78; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: