Key result
The HeartCycle automated education and coaching program helped 80% of nonadherent heart failure patients who started physical activity coaching to achieve their personal goals for two consecutive weeks.
Why the study?
Does the HeartCycle education and coaching program improve adherence to self-care behaviors in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=123)
Yes
Does the HeartCycle education and coaching program improve adherence to self-care behaviors in patients with heart failure?
An automated online education and coaching program helped the majority of nonadherent heart failure patients adopt recommended self-care behaviors such as physical activity and a low-salt diet.
Supports automated coaching feasibility in heart failure; leaves open randomized confirmation of adherence and outcome benefits.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is common, and it is associated with high rates of hospital readmission and mortality. It is generally assumed that appropriate self-care can improve outcomes in patients with HF, but patient adherence to many self-care behaviors is poor. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to develop and test an intervention to increase self-care in patients with HF using a novel, online, automated education and coaching program. METHODS: The online automated program was developed using a well-established, face-to-face, home-based cardiac rehabilitation approach. Education is tailored to the behaviors and knowledge of the individual patient, and the system supports patients in adopting self-care behaviors. Patients are guided through a goal-setting process that they conduct at their own pace through the support of the system, and they record their progress in an electronic diary such that the system can provide appropriate feedback. Only in challenging situations do HF nurses intervene to offer help. The program was evaluated in the HeartCycle study, a multicenter, observational trial with randomized components in which researchers investigated the ability of a third-generation telehealth system to enhance the management of patients with HF who had a recent (<60 days) admission to the hospital for symptoms or signs of HF (either new onset or recurrent) or were outpatients with persistent New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV symptoms despite treatment with diuretic agents. The patients were enrolled from January 2012 through February 2013 at 3 hospital sites within the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. RESULTS: Of 123 patients enrolled (mean age 66 years (SD 12), 66% NYHA III, 79% men), 50 patients (41%) reported that they were not physically active, 56 patients (46%) did not follow a low-salt diet, 6 patients (5%) did not restrict their fluid intake, and 6 patients (5%) did not take their medication as prescribed. About 80% of the patients who started the coaching program for physical activity and low-salt diet became adherent by achieving their personal goals for 2 consecutive weeks. After becoming adherent, 61% continued physical activity coaching, but only 36% continued low-salt diet coaching. CONCLUSIONS: The HeartCycle education and coaching program helped most nonadherent patients with HF to adopt recommended self-care behaviors. Automated coaching worked well for most patients who started the coaching program, and many patients who achieved their goals continued to use the program. For many patients who did not engage in the automated coaching program, their choice was appropriate rather than a failure of the program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stut et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=123). HeartCycle automated education and coaching program was evaluated on Adherence to physical activity goals for 2 consecutive weeks among those who started coaching. The HeartCycle automated education and coaching program helped 80% of nonadherent heart failure patients who started physical activity coaching to achieve their personal goals for two consecutive weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: