Key result
Transthoracic electrical impedance fails to reliably identify severe pulmonary edema on single measurements.
Observational (n=60)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To evaluate the clinical usefulness of measuring transthoracic electrical impedance in patients with pulmonary edema, we studied 27 normal subjects and 33 patients. In normal subjects, impedance increased when body position changed from supine to standing (p less than 0.01) and when lung volume increased from residual volume to total lung capacity (p less than 0.01). Impedance values vari7 omega) when measured hourly without removing the electrodes. In only five of 11 patients with clinically severe pulmonary edema and five of eight with radiologically severe pulmonary edema were impedance values outside the normal range. Changes in impedance values correlated with changes in clinical and radiographic indexes of pulmonary edema. We conclude that (1) single measurements of impedance are useless in diagnosing pulmonary edema, and (2) impedance changes as predicted as pulmonary edema increases and decreases, and these changes are readily detected by simpler methods of evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fein et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Pulmonary edema (n=60). Transthoracic electrical impedance measurement vs. Normal subjects and clinical/radiographic indexes of pulmonary edema was evaluated on Impedance values outside the normal range in severe pulmonary edema. Transthoracic electrical impedance was abnormal in only 5/11 clinically severe and 5/8 radiologically severe pulmonary edema patients, making single measurements useless for diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: