Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of the relative orientation and electronegativity of substituents on the magnitude of 3 J (aa), 3 J (ae) and 3 J (ee) is well predicated by a simple set of additivity constants, valid for pyranose rings in carbohydrates. The proposed set of parameters is used to calculate 327 coupling constants [ 3 J (HH)] in a variety of pyranosides and related compounds. A comparison with experimental values taken from the literature shows that couplings in molecules which are conformationally pure and underformed can be predicted with a surprising accuracy. An overall root‐mean‐square agreement of 0.29 Hz is attained for a selected group of 305 coupling values. A statistical breakdown of Δ J (aa) and Δ J (ae) [Δ J = J (exp)‐ J (calc)] along each carbon‐carbon bond in the pyranose systems reveals an unexpected degree of geometrical homogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altona et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: