Key result
Blood volume pulse signal analysis from a wristband device discriminated atrial fibrillation with 0.754 sensitivity, 0.963 specificity, and approximately 0.9 accuracy.
Why the study?
Does blood volume pulse signal analysis using a wristband device accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to normal sinus rhythm or other arrhythmias?
Observational (n=70)
Does blood volume pulse signal analysis using a wristband device accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to normal sinus rhythm or other arrhythmias?
A wristband device analyzing blood volume pulse signals can accurately discriminate atrial fibrillation from normal sinus rhythm and other arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support wristband AF detection in research settings; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are at high risk of cardioembolic stroke or other complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the blood volume pulse (BVP) signals obtained from a wristband device and develop an algorithm for discriminating AF from normal sinus rhythm (NSR) or from other arrhythmias (ARR). APPROACH: Thirty patients with AF, 9 with ARR and 31 in NSR were included in the study. The recordings were obtained at rest from Empatica E4 wristband device and lasted 10 min. The analysis, on a 2 min segment, included spectral, variability and irregularity analysis performed on the inter-diastolic interval series, and similarity analysis performed on the BVP signal. Main results and Significance: Variability parameters were the highest in AF, the lowest in NSR and intermediate for ARR, as an example pNN50 values were, respectively, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] (p < 0.05). The similarity parameters were the highest in NSR, the lowest in AF and intermediate for ARR, as an example using a threshold for assessing similarity of [Formula: see text]: [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], all p < 0.05. The rhythm classification was preceded by over-sampling (using synthetic minority over-sampling technique) the class of ARR, being it the smallest class. Then, the features selection was performed (using the sequential forward floating search algorithm) which identified two variability parameters (pNN70 and pNN40) as the best selection. The classification by the k-nearest neighbor classifier reached an accuracy of about 0.9 for NSR and AF, and 0.8 for ARR. Using pNN70 and pNN40, the specificity for the three rhythms was Spnsr = 0.928, Spaf = 0.963, Sparr = 0.768, while the sensitivity was Spnsr = 0.773, Spaf = 0.754, Sparr = 0.758.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corino et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=70). Blood volume pulse signal analysis via wristband device vs. Normal sinus rhythm and other arrhythmias was evaluated on Discrimination of atrial fibrillation from normal sinus rhythm or other arrhythmias. Blood volume pulse signal analysis from a wristband device discriminated atrial fibrillation with 0.754 sensitivity, 0.963 specificity, and approximately 0.9 accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: