Why the study?
Does protamine sulfate effectively neutralize the anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities of low molecular weight heparin (PK 10169) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does protamine sulfate effectively neutralize the anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities of low molecular weight heparin (PK 10169) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Protamine sulfate incompletely neutralizes the anti-Xa activity of low molecular weight heparin PK 10169, which may complicate bleeding management during cardiac surgery.
May complicate bleeding management in cardiac surgery on LMWH; leaves open need for clinical validation of reversal strategies.
Neutralization of a low molecular weight (LMW) heparin fraction by protamine sulfate was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities were measured by amidolytic and coagulation methods (activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT). Fifteen patients (4 males and 11 females) underwent surgery with extracorporeal circulation. In vitro, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities and APTT of unfractionated heparin were neutralized with a protamine/heparin (P/H) gravimetric ratio of 1.6, 1.33 and about 2, respectively. Anti-IIa activity and APTT induced by PK 10169 were completely corrected at a P/H ratio of 1 and 2, respectively, while anti-Xa activity was incompletely neutralized at a ratio of 5. In vivo, in 9 patients who did not receive intravenous protamine sulfate, a good correlation was found between doses of PK 10169 infused, anti-IIa plasma level and blood loss. In 3 patients who were treated prophylactically with protamine, bleeding was normal or only slightly increased. In 3 patients who received protamine because of hemorrhage, mean anti-Xa and anti-IIa were 2.3 and 0.54 U before and 1.32-0.06 U after neutralization. Bleeding was stopped by a second dose of protamine in 1 patient, but blood loss was abnormal in the other patients. However, a correlation between bleeding and anti-Xa or anti-IIa activities was not clearly evident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massonnet-Castel et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: