Key result
Ticagrelor therapy significantly reduced the risk of saphenous vein graft occlusion at 1 year after CABG compared to non-ticagrelor therapy (11.4% vs 14.3%; RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.97; p=0.03).
Why the study?
Ticagrelor provides robust platelet inhibition and may be an alternative to aspirin, but its effect in patients undergoing CABG has not been well confirmed.
Does ticagrelor therapy reduce saphenous vein graft occlusion at 1 year in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-ticagrelor therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,305)
Does ticagrelor therapy reduce saphenous vein graft occlusion at 1 year in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-ticagrelor therapy?
Relative Risk: 0.79 (95% CI 0.64–0.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.4% vs 14.3%
p-value: p=0.03
Ticagrelor therapy significantly reduces the risk of saphenous vein graft occlusion at 1 year after elective CABG compared to non-ticagrelor therapy, without increasing the risk of bleeding requiring reoperation.
Supports ticagrelor post-CABG to lower graft occlusion risk; extends randomized evidence on intensified antiplatelet therapy after surgical revascularization.
Objective Ticagrelor may be an alternative to aspirin as it provides robust and consistent platelet inhibition. However, the effect of ticagrelor treatment in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not been well confirmed. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether ticagrelor therapy affects outcomes in CABG patients. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 4 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials that assessed ticagrelor versus non-ticagrelor in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was the incidence of saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion at 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes were SVG occlusion at 7 days, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding requiring reoperation. Results Seven trials including 4305 patients (2153 randomized to ticagrelor therapy and 2152 to non-ticagrelor therapy) were included. One-hundred and thirty of 1140 patients (11.4%) randomized to the ticagrelor group versus 175 of 1220 patients (14.3%) randomized to the non-ticagrelor group experienced SVG occlusion at 1 year after CABG. Compared to the control group, ticagrelor therapy yielded a significantly lower risk of SVG occlusion [RR 0.79 (0.64–0.97), p = 0.03]. In the subgroup analysis, ticagrelor plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone did not decrease the risk of SVG occlusion after 1 year [RR 0.65 (0.40–1.07), p = 0.09]. There was no difference in the incidence of SVG occlusion at 7 days [RR 0.67 (0.42–1.06), p = 0.09], MACE up to 1 year [RR 0.99 (0.81–1.21), p = 0.90], or bleeding requiring reoperation [RR 1.16 (0.80–1.70), p = 0.44]. Conclusions Compared with non-ticagrelor therapy, ticagrelor decreased the risk of saphenous vein graft occlusion after 1 year in patients undergoing elective CABG with saphenous vein grafting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiang et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=4,305). Ticagrelor vs. Non-ticagrelor therapy was evaluated on Incidence of saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion at 1 year after CABG (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97, p=0.03). Ticagrelor therapy significantly reduced the risk of saphenous vein graft occlusion at 1 year after CABG compared to non-ticagrelor therapy (11.4% vs 14.3%; RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.97; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: