The genus Erioscyphella Kirschst., which was morphologically confused with Lachnum , was herein examined. Based on molecular phylogenetic analyses using a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 and morphological examinations, Erioscyphella was distinguished from Lachnum and redefined by longer ascospores and the presence of apical amorphous materials and/or resinous materials equipped on hairs. Species boundaries recognized by morphology/ecology and phylogenetic analyses were cross-checked using species delimitation analyses based on DNA barcode sequences downloaded from UNITE, resulting in that species’ taxonomic problems being uncovered. Six new species ( E. boninensis , E. insulae , E. otanii , E. papillaris , E. paralushanensis , and E. sasibrevispora ) and two new combinations ( E. hainanensis and E. sinensis ) were proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tochihara et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: