This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) distribution is a promising strategy to increase HIV treatment accessibility in Africa, yet population-level coverage and correlates of enrollment are understudied. We pooled data from seven Population-based HIV Impact Assessment surveys (2020–2023) and used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression with jackknife variance estimation to identify socio-demographic and clinical correlates of enrollment in community, relative to facility-based, ART distribution models. Across countries, 11,629 virally suppressed (<1000 RNA copies/ml) persons on ART for >12 months (mean age: 42.1 years, 67.0% female) self-reported their assigned ART refill model, 2.9% of whom received ART from a community-based pickup point (range: 0.5% in Mozambique to 7.6% in Zimbabwe). Correlates of enrollment in a community-based refill model included rural residence (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR] = 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.20–4.21), past-year mobility (adjOR=1.56, 95%CI: 1.05–2.31), ART dispensing intervals of >6 months (adjOR=2.36, 95%CI: 1.11–5.02), and transportation-related barriers to facility-based HIV care (adjOR=1.43, 95%CI: 1.01–2.03). Among virally suppressed males, superior virologic control at the <200 copies/ml (adjOR=7.12, 95%CI: 1.59–31.97) and <400 copies/ml (adjOR=6.08, 95%CI: 1.34–27.57) levels was observed among those enrolled in a community-based, relative to facility-based, ART distribution model. Findings affirm the potential of community-based refill models to reach populations susceptible to HIV care attrition, but coverage estimates remain low, indicating implementation barriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukose et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: