The robustness of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solvers is a significant challenge in gradient-based aerodynamic shape optimization , especially when encountering shapes that produce highly separated flows . These cases often cause solvers to diverge or exhibit limit-cycle oscillations. Common practices rely on averaging non-converged solutions and often yield gradients that mislead optimizers, resulting in poor designs or failure. To address this, we extend the modified-BoostConv method to ensure full convergence of SIMPLE-based RANS solvers in such conditions, providing model-accurate gradients using the complex-step derivative technique. Building on previous work, we introduce a novel coupling approach that resolves stability issues in earlier implementations of the modified-Boostconv method by splitting the basis construction for complex residuals into its solution (real) and gradient (imaginary) components. The gradient accuracy of averaged solutions from non-converging solvers is compared to fully converged gradients using the chaotic logistic map equation and a RANS simulation of a bluff body undergoing massive flow separation . We then optimize a shape starting from a 80% thick bluff body, demonstrating the importance of accurate gradients. Using model-accurate gradients, we obtain an optimized 18% thick airfoil with a high lift-to-drag ratio, matching the results of optimizing a NACA 0018 airfoil and indicating the presence of a global optimum. Conversely, optimization with averaged gradients failed to improve the initial shape. This study highlights the limitations of gradient averaging for non-converging solvers. It demonstrates that fully converged gradients reliably guide the optimizer toward attached flow regions, where RANS models are more accurate and reliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dicholkar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: